Vahid Mirzaee, Mahsa Molaee, Hamid Mohaghegh Shalmani, Homayoun Zojaji,
Reza Mashayekhi, Mohammad Reza zali
ABSTRACT
Aim: To
determine the expression of DNA MMR proteins, including hMLH1 and hMSH2, in
gastric epithelial cells of patients with or without H. pylori infected
gastritis.
Background:
Impairment of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is a known mechanism of
carcinogenesis and tumor progression in both sporadic and hereditary human
cancers.
Patients and methods: Fifty H.pylori-positive patients and 50 H.pylori-negative subjects were
enrolled in the study. During endoscopy of patients with non-ulcer
dyspepsia, 2 antral and 2 corpus biopsies were taken for histologic
examination (Giemsa stain) and immunohistochemical staining on hMLH1 and
hMSH2.
Results: The
percentage of epithelial cell nuclei demonstrating positivity for hMLH1
staining was 84.14±7.32
in H.pylori-negative subjects in comparison of 73.34±10.10
in H.pylori-positive patients (p<0.0001). The percentage of epithelial cell
nuclei demonstrating positivity for hMSH2 staining did not differ
significantly (81.16±8.32 in
H.pylori-negative versus 78.24±8.71
in H.pylori-positive patients; NS).
Conclusion:
Study indicates that H.pylori might promote development of gastric carcinoma
at least in part through the ability to affect the DNA MMR system.
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, DNA mismatch repair (MMR), hMLH1,
hMSH2.
(Iranian Journal of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2008;1(1):33-38).
INTRODUCTION
Helicobacter
pylori (H. pylori) infection affects about half of the worldwide population, and
gastric carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignancies despite a decrease in
incidence and mortality in recent decades (1,2). The association of H.pylori
with gastric cancer is supported by epidemiologic studies showing odds ratios
for gastric cancer up to 9-fold greater in H.pylori-infected individuals (3).
Chronic H.pylori infection can causes chronic gastritis, which often progresses
to gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia which are premalignant lesions of
the stomach (4). Although many epidemiologic studies have addressed the
association of H.pylori infection and gastric cancer, fewer advances have been
made to understand how long it takes for H.pylori infection to induce the
development of gastric cancer.
Main molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development
include the overexpression of genes, including oncogenes and growth factors or
their receptors, and impaired expression of tumor suppressor genes resulting
from mutation or allelic losses (5,6) and deficiencies of the DNA mismatch
repair (MMR) system (7,8).
Impairment of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is a
known mechanism of carcinogenesis and tumor progression of both sporadic and
hereditary human cancers (9,10). The MMR deficiency leads to the accumulation of
base-base mismatches, and the short insertion/deletion mispairs during DNA
replication resulting in widespread mutation (11) generated as a consequence of
DNA replication errors. Most cells deficient in MMR display a high level of
genomic instability characterized by changes in simple repetitive sequences
so-called microsatellite instability (MSI). Chronic H pylori infection damages
gastric barrier function (12,13) and stimulates gastric cell proliferation
(14-19) which leads to mucosal repair (20), but can also induce cellular DNA
damage (18-22).
H. pylori gastritis occurs more frequently in
individuals with microsatellite instability-positive than those with
microsatellite instability-negative gastric cancers, raising the possibility
that H. pylori infection affects DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system (23).
The aim of this study was to determine the expression
of DNA MMR proteins, including hMLH1 and hMSH2, in gastric epithelial cells of
patients with or without H. pylori infected gastritis.
PATIENTS and METHODS
We examined dyspeptic patients who referred for
endoscopic evaluation to Taleghani hospital in
Patients were considered to be H.pylori positive when
histologic demonstration of H.pylori was positive. 50 patients with H.pylori
positive and 50 subjects with H.pylori negative were enrolled in the study. The
updated
Immunohistochemical staining was performed following
Envision method on the gastric biopsy specimens of 50 patients of both H.pylori-positive
and -negative groups. Four micron-thick sections were obtained from
formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. The tissue sections were
deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded concentrations of alcohol.
Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by treating the sections with
blocking solution. For antigen retrieval, the sections were treated while
boiling in citrate buffer [pH 9.0] in a microwave. Then sections were incubated
with primary antibodies hMLH1 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, clone:G168-15,
1:100 dilution)
and hMSH2 (Calbiochem, Oncogene sciences,clone FE11, 1:100 dilution).
After each step, slides were washed with TBS buffer for 3 minutes. Then,
slides were treated with Envision (DAKO, REAL Envision) for 20 minutes. To
visualize immunoreaction, 3, 2 ′-diaminobenzidine was used and samples were
counterstained with hematoxylin. Intramucosal lymphocytes were used as positive
controls. Samples of patients with HNPCC (hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer)
were used for negative control. The slides were evaluated by two pathologists
who were blinded to the H.pylori status.
A case was considered positive for expression of hMLH1
or hMSH2 in the presence of nuclear staining of the epithelial cells; however,
it was considered negative when there was a complete absence of nuclear staining
of the epithelial cells in the presence of an unquestioned internal positive
control. The staining intensity was divided into three grades. We counted more
than 500 epithelial cells (including glandular neck, foveolar and surface
epithelium) in each case using 200 magnifications. Quantitative I analysis was
performed by measuring the total number of cells and the positive-staining
epithelial cells. The percentage positivity was then calculated (24).
RESULTS
Fifty H.pylori-positive patients with mean (±standard deviation) age of 41.78±15.21 years and 50 H.pylori-negative patients with mean age of 46.58±13.41 were studied (NS). There was no significant difference between male to female ratio among two groups. (28/22 in H.pylori-positive versus 23/27 in H.pylori-negative group). Table 1 demonstrated characteristic and pathologic data of both groups. As shown in table 1, pathologic finding such as gastritis severity, gastritis activity, intestinal metaplasia, gastric atrophy and dysplasia were not significantly different between groups.
Table 1.
Demographic and pathologic findings among H.pylori-positive and H.pylori-negative
patients
|
|
H.pylori positive group (n=50) |
H.pylori negative group (n=50) |
p-value |
|
Age(years) |
41.78±15.21 |
46.58±13.41 |
0.1 |
|
Male: female
|
28:22 |
23:27 |
0.32 |
|
Gastritis severity |
|||
|
1 |
8
(16%) |
13
(26%) |
0.45 |
|
2 |
34
(68%) |
29
(58%) |
|
|
3 |
8
(16%) |
8
(16%) |
|
|
Gastritis activity |
|||
|
0 |
8
(16%) |
15
(30%) |
0.23 |
|
1 |
6
(12%) |
9
(18%) |
|
|
2 |
28
(56%) |
20
(40%) |
|
|
3 |
8
(16%) |
6
(12%) |
|
|
Intestinal metaplasia |
|||
|
Positive |
8
(16%) |
11(22%) |
0.45 |
|
Negative |
42
(84%) |
39(78%) |
|
|
Atrophy |
|||
|
Positive |
7
(14%) |
5
(10%) |
0.54 |
|
Negative |
43
(86%) |
45
(90%) |
|
|
Dysplasia |
|||
|
Positive |
3
(6%) |
1
(2%) |
0.31 |
|
Negative |
47
(94%) |
49
(98%) |
|
The percentage of epithelial cell nuclei demonstrating positivity for hMLH1 staining was 84.14±7.32 in H.pylori-negative patients, while it was 73.34±10.10 in H.pylori-positive patients (p<0.0001). However, there was a non-significant difference between groups regarding to the percentage of epithelial cell nuclei demonstrating positivity for hMSH2 staining (81.16±8.32 in H.pylori-negative versus 78.24±8.71 in H.pylori-positive patients; p=0.09). As shown in table 2, the results of immunohistochemical staining in body and antrum was relatively similar for hMLH1 or hMSH2. Intensity of immmunohistochemical staining for hMLH1 was not significantly differed between groups (1.99±0.41 in H.pylori-negative versus 1.95±0.47 in H.pylori-positive patients; p=0.64). For hMSH2, intensity of immmunohistochemical staining was 1.93±0.46 in H.pylori-negative versus 1.99±0.42 in H.pylori-positive patients; however their difference did reach a significant level.
Table 2.
Results of immunohistochemical staining among H.pylori-positive -negative
patients
|
|
H.pylori positive group (n=50) |
H.pylori negative group (n=50) |
p-value |
|
hMLH1 |
|
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
Area
|
73.80±11.77* |
85.28±7.71 |
0.000 |
|
Intensity |
2.02±0.65 |
2.08±0.63 |
0.64 |
|
Antrum |
|
|
|
|
Area |
72.44±11.35 |
82.36±9.63 |
0.000 |
|
Intensity |
1.88±0.59 |
1.92±0.63 |
0.75 |
|
Overall |
|
|
|
|
Area |
73.34±10.10 |
84.14±7.32 |
0.000 |
|
Intensity |
1.95±0.47 |
1.99±0.41 |
0.64 |
|
hMLH2 |
|
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
Area |
77.24±11.36 |
81.28±10.58 |
0.07 |
|
Intensity |
1.96±0.57 |
1.96±0.64 |
1.00 |
|
Antrum |
|
|
|
|
Area |
78.76±11.24 |
80.62±10.89 |
0.40 |
|
Intensity |
2.04±0.53 |
1.90±0.65 |
0.24 |
|
Overall |
|
|
|
|
Area
|
78.24±8.71 |
81.16±8.32 |
0.09 |
|
Intensity |
1.99±0.42 |
1.93±0.46 |
0.50 |
* mean±SD
DISCUSSION
The
relation between H pylori infection, gastric mucosal damage, and the cell
proliferation rate is a matter of debate. One hypothesis explains that H.pylori
causes an impairment of DNA repair in the gastric epithelium. This results in
accumulation of mutations and a genomic imbalance in the epithelium, increasing
the risk of gastric carcinoma (27). Previous studies have shown that active
H.pylori infection neither was more frequently seen in patients who had
MSI-positive gastric carcinomas or intestinal metaplasia nor attach to carcinoma
cells in vivo. It is possible that during chronic gastritis, H.pylori is
physically in direct contact with gastric epithelial cells, disturb epithelial
cell molecular pathway. Studies on cytokine induction by H.pylori support this
hypothesis (28,29). During chronic gastritis the mucosa undergoes rapid turnover
and increased cell proliferation may permit an increased number of uncorrected
mutations that may be induced by inadequate DNA MMR activity. Impairment of DNA
mismatch repair (MMR) system is a known mechanism of carcinogenesis and tumor
progression of both sporadic and hereditary human cancers (9,10). In humans, MMR
is mediated by at least six genes, including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6,
hPMS2, and hPMS1 (30). Germline mutations in hMSH2 and
hMLH1 account for about 90% of all reported MMR gene mutations, whereas
hPMS2 and hMSH6 account for the reminders (31). Several studies have
shown that hMLH1 and hMSH2 are the two main MMR proteins and the other MMR
proteins including hPMS2, hPMS1, and hMSH6 seem to be unstable in the absence of
the main MMR proteins (32,33).
Our
findings indicate that decreased levels of hMLH1 proteins were seen in
gastric epithelial cells in H.pylori positive patients. Although the level of
hMSH2 proteins was lower in H.pylori positive patients, their difference did
not reach a statistically significant level. Results are in agreement with
Halling KC et al. in which they found that microsattelite instability (MSI)-
positive gastric carcinomas are usually associated with lack of hMLH1 and rarely
with lack of hMSH2 (34). Leung et al. demonstrated that active H.pylori
infection was more frequently found in individuals with MSI-positive than in
those with MSI- negative gastric cancers, proposing that H.pylori infection
affects the DNA MMR system during the stepwise progression of gastric
carcinogenesis (28).
Park et
al studied the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in patients with chronic H.pylori
infection before and after eradication of the H.pylori. They found that the
expression of DNA MMR proteins increased in the gastric mucosa after H.pylori
eradication, indicating that H.pylori may be associated with a reduced DNA MMR
system (27). Kim JJ et al cocultured gastric cancer cell lines with H.pylori and
then determined MutL and MutS DNA MMR protein and RNA levels. All cell lines
showed decreased levels of MutL and MutS DNA MMR proteins in a dose dependent
manner after coculture with H.pylori strains (23). Lack of efficient DNA MMR
system can potentially have dramatic effects in the cell genome by allowing the
accumulation of mutations in critical regulatory genes.
In this
study, the results of immunohistochemical staining of body and antrum were
similar for hMLH1 and hMSH2. It indicates that H.pylori affects DNA MMR stems of
gastric epithelium regardless of its location.
REFERENCES
1.
Parkin DM, Pisani
P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in
1985. Int J Cancer 1993;54:594-606.
2.
Landis SH, Murray
T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:6-29.
3.
Huang JQ, Sridhar
S, Chen Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori
seropositivity and gastric cancer. Gastroenterology 1998;114: 1169-79.
4.
Sipponen P, Hyvärinen
H, Seppälä K, et al. Review article: Pathogenesis of the transformation from
gastritis to malignancy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:61-71.
5.
Todd R, Wong DTW.
Oncogenes. Anticancer Res 1999;19:4729-46.
6.
Teh BT, Larsson
C, Nordenskjöld M. Tumor suppressor genes (TSG). Anticancer Res
1999;19:4715-28.
7.
Liu B,
8.
Boland CR.
Molecular genetics of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Ann N Y Acad
Sci 2000;910:50-61.
9.
Eshleman JR,
Markowitz SD. Mismatch repair defects in human carcinogenesis. Hum Mol Genet
1996;5:1489–94.
10.
Kinzler KW,
Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 1996;87:159–70.
11.
12.
Nardone G,
D’Armiento F, Corso G, et al. Lipids of human gastric mucosa: effect of
Helicobacter pylori infection and non alcoholic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology
1994;107:362–8.
13.
Mauch F, Bode G,
Ditschuneit H, et al. Demonstration of a phospholipid–rich zone in the human
gastric epithelium damaged by Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology
1993;105:1698–704.
14.
Correa P.
Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:S37–43.
15.
Lynch DAF,
Mapstone NP, Clarke AMT, et al. Cell proliferation in Helicobacter pylori
associated gastritis and the effect of eradication therapy. Gut 1995;36: 346–50.
16.
Lynch DAF,
Mapstone NP, Clarke AMT, et al. Cell proliferation in the gastric corpus in
Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis and after gastric resection. Gut
1995;36:351–3.
17.
Brenes F, Ruiz B,
Correa P, et al. Helicobacter pylori causes hyperproliferation of the gastric
epithelium: pre- and posteradication indices of proliferating cell nuclear
antigen. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1870–5.
18.
Fox JG, Xiantang
LI, Rachel JC, et al. Hypertrophic gastropathy in Helicobacter felis-infected
wild-type C57BL/6 mice and p53 homozygous transgenic mice. Gastroenterology
1996;110:155–66.
19.
Correa P, Ruiz B,
Shi TY, et al. Helicobacter pylori and nucleolar organizer regions in the
gastric antral mucosa. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:656–60.
20.
Panella C,
Ierardi E, Polimeno L, et al. Proliferative activity of gastric epithelium in
progressive stages of Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:
1132–8.
21.
Medline A, Farber
E. The multi-step theory of neoplasia. In: Anthony PP, Sweeney RNM, editors.
Recent advances in histopathology. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone,
1981;p:19-34.
22.
Yabuki N, Sasano
H, Tobita M, et al. Analysis of cell damage and proliferation in Helicobacter
pylori-infected human gastric mucosa from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.
Am J Pathol 1997;151:821–9.
23.
Kim JJ, Tao H,
Carloni E, et al. Helicobacter pylori impairs DNA mismatch repair in gastric
epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 2002;123:542-53.
24.
25.
Westbrook JI,
McIntosh JH, Talley NJ. The impact of dyspepsia definition on prevalence
estimates: considerations for future researchers. Scand J Gastroenterol.
2000;35:227-33.
26.
Dixon MF, Genta
RM, Yardley JH, et al. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated
Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis,
27.
Park DI, Park SH,
Kim SH, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the expression of DNA
mismatch repair protein. Helicobacter 2005;10:179-84.
28.
Leung WK, Kim
JJ, Kim JG, et al. Microsatellite instability in gastric intestinal metaplasia
in patients with and without gastric cancer. Am J Pathol 2000;156: 537-43.
29.
Crabtree
JE, Wyatt JI, Trejdosiewicz LK, et al. Interleukin-8 expression in Helicobacter
pylori infected, normal, and neoplastic gastroduodenal mucosa. J Clin Pathol
1994;47:61-66.
30.
Jiricny J.
Replication errors: challenging the genome. EMBO J 1998;17:6427–36.
31.
Lindor NM, Greene
MH. The concise handbook of family cancer syndromes. Mayo Familial Cancer
Program. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1039–71.
32.
Leung WK, Kim
JJ, Wu L, et al. Identification of a second MutL DNA mismatch repair complex
(hPMS1 and hMLH1) in human epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2000;275:15728-32.
33.
34.
Halling KC,
Harper J,