Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022): March-April 2022
  4. CASE REPORT

Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022)

May 2022

A 16-year Remained UroLume Stent without any Complication; a Case Report

  • Seyed Jalil Hoseini
  • Shideh Moftakhari Hajimirzaei
  • Rayka Sharifian Amiri
  • Ehsan Shojaeefar
  • Ali Mohammad Mirjalili

Urology Journal, Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022), 5 May 2022 , Page 157-158
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v19i02.6874 Published: 2021-12-20

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Lumen diameter reduction which is called urethral stricture has several causative agents including iatrogenic,
inflammatory, traumatic, and idiopathic factors. The main treatment options are transurethral or open surgical interventions.The UroLume which was introduced around 33 years ago is an intraurethral stent and as a temporary treatment approach has a maximum 9-month durability, but here we present the first ever reported forgotten 16-year remained UroLume without any complication.

Keywords:
  • Urethral Stricture
  • Stents
  • Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • 6874/pdf

How to Cite

Jalil Hoseini, S. ., Moftakhari Hajimirzaei, S., Sharifian Amiri, R., Shojaeefar, E., & Mirjalili, A. M. (2021). A 16-year Remained UroLume Stent without any Complication; a Case Report. Urology Journal, 19(02), 157–158. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v19i02.6874
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Mangir N, Chapple C. Recent Advances in treatment of urethral stricture disease in men. F1000Research. 2020;9.

Abdeen BM, Badreldin AM. Urethral Strictures. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020.

Alwaal A, Blaschko S, McAninch J, Breyer B. Epidemiology of urethral strictures. Transl Androl Urol 2014; 3: 209–13.

Tritschler S, Roosen A, Füllhase C, Stief CG, Rübben H. Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2013;110:220.

Frankiewicz M, Karolina M, Marcin M. Diagnosis and Management of Urolume Urethral Stent Complications Using Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Urology. 2020;144:e4-e5.

Botelho F, Thomas AA, Miocinovic R, Angermeier KW. Endoscopic removal of a proximal urethral stent using a holmium laser: Case report and literature review. Urology annals. 2012;4:191.

CORUJO M, BADLANI GH. Uncommon complications of permanent stents. Journal of endourology. 1998;12:385-8.

McNamara ER, Webster GD, Peterson AC. The UroLume stent revisited: the Duke experience. Urology. 2013;82:933-6.

Feagure Legeand:

Figure 1: RUG of a 53-year old man with a 16-year remained UroLume and without any stricture

  • Abstract Viewed: 301 times
  • 6874/pdf Downloaded: 202 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus